Random Conversation 2.0

I'm curious about this myself. As someone who has never watched that show (and probably never will) I wonder who's new.

 

My guess is either Ben Carson, Marco Rubio, or Ted Cruz although I'm not sure if he counts himself as a minority or not.

 

I know there's a good chance of the white female - white male ticket, but IF, just if, it was a black guy or other minority, I wonder who?


I like your guesses.

 

He probably would count himself as one if he had to get on a ticket to show diversity, but otherwise I don't honestly think he sees himself as one.

 

Hmm. Nicole Wallace is neither dumb nor crazy, now let's look at some cons.

She's held prominent media-related positions in Republican cabinets but has never run for political office herself. She is good at the talking head circuit on the View and Sunday morning poli-chat shows but don't see her as a national candidate.

She's also a California girl who attended Berkeley, a well-hated university by conservatives. It would be easy to paint her as a moderate and alienate tea party types who are looking for red meat in 2016.

 

Paul does not like Ted Cruz, but politics also makes for strange bedfellows.

I would put even money on Rubio as it makes winning Florida more viable. There is only a handful of states that actually win a presidential election with OH and FL being the most important in recent years.

There is talk of Ben Carson. He doesn't seem to be on that pet Negro shit like Herman Cain. Paul and Carson are both doctors and it would be the smartest Republican ticket in years. Like Nicole Wallace he's never held public office and am not sure how he'd respond to the grind of a national campaign.

 

I see your point but you have to admit that is she would be a good one to model after...another words they should be looking for someone on her level...I really like her for not being dumb and crazy

 

Hilary is winning and it doesnt matter who the repugnant republicans bring

 

I've just received texts from, what turns out to be, a wrong number. They were all gansta and hood sounding. When I asked who it is, I got a photo of two white dudes with naturally red hair!!! omg

 

What can we say, ur just that special

:freehug:

 

Sorry about that

 

lol it was a good laugh

 

Thanks! Today turned out beautiful, my gf was totally beside herself and we pulled off a great surprise very good day and I know we really lifted her spirits!

 

106 days down, 18 to go! :smt049:smt049

Hard to believe that much time went by without seeing him, thank goodness for texting. And his being cute, sending me video messages once in awhile when I say I miss seeing his face

 

I'm not wild about having pets at all. But, it seems like a lot of women I'm interested in, love their Poofys, Spottys, Kitlers, Jaspers, and Munchies. Do I really need to suck up my personal dissatisfaction over this and just allow myself to be coddled with a house that will remain not so clean and with animal funk in the ambiance?

Seems like the case, which is why I may go Hitler on this whole matter to balance things out.

 

Depends on the chick, what kind of animal she has, etc. A lot of white women like dogs and are into animal rescue. They'll usually have some pussy-assed dog that isn't even good for protecting the home. Not a fan at all.

 

I guess they care more about cuteness than practical purposes. To each their own, I suppose. I owned pets before (turtles), and I mainly see them as just entertainment. Because of that, I really see no real use or meaning to owning one.

Also, you're free to call me cynical, but I think most people who own pets and tend to have a strong love for them tend to be the biggest misanthropes in the world due to their redirected concerns over the lives of non-human animals and not wanting to better the world through a coexistent conjunction of life and the animal kingdom within it.

 

For a guy that loves poop as much as you do...I would think cleaning a litter box or picking up in the back yard would be orgasmic for you

 

Talking about it for shock purposes is one thing. But the act themselves? It's another...