Dude, you are the one resorting to all caps to make a point which suggest something is wrong with your fucking state of mind.
But since you are resorting to revisionism let me try to set things straight.
1-I'm happy Coli tried to school you on what it means to be labeled a Hispanic. Now please don't to to the same to me because I don't need the schooling. For example I would never refer to Mexican as a race nor did I do so in this thread, so why even bring it up in the first place? I understand that technically speaking there is no Hispanic race but here's the thing....that doesn't stop many so-called Latinos from considering themselves as one race. Its extremely complicated but the reality is that you can be a Latino of mostly European descent, mostly African descent or one of Native American descent. You can also be a combination of all those things or a couple of those things such as mulattoes or you can be mestizo. Mestizo is the combo of Native American and European. Think Jennifer Lopez, she fits that type, and people of her complexion and mixture make up most of the people that are labeled as Hispanics. A white/heavily European ancestry Hispanic would be someone like Ana de Armas of the recent Blade Runner and if she was in "Waves" instead I would have considered that relationship to be between a bm and a ww. Demie however is clearly mestizo. She doesn't necessarily talk about her heritage but I never read anything that defined her as white or which she referred to herself as white. If Hollywood thought she was they wouldn't be tossing at her roles in which her characters have a Spanish surname. Let me ask did you ever refer to her as the white gal when commenting on your obsession, Euphoria? When the four young actors in "Waves" were being talked about during the Toronto Film Festival it was mentioned how three of them were people of color and the only one was white. The white one is a male and he has a relationship with the black sister in the film. That's the only black-white hookup in the damn movie. Period. This is a pet peeve of mine. Hated when growing up people were referring to any Asian they see as being Chinese or today in which we refer to Hispanics as "Spanish". That's lazy American nonsense. So if I see someone getting an ethnicity wrong or confused I will typically step in and say something.
2- Once again you fail to grasp that my correcting you had nothing to do about thinking the thread was specifically about black men and white women. Even though it does state in the thread title that its for discussions regarding BM/WW, most of us here have given up on the idea that people will stay within those parameters when discussing movies. That's why when I created my Upcoming IR Slate thread I didn't even bother with it, I instead made it clear in the title it was about IR and not specifically bm/ww. So its all good in all these threads these days to broaden the topic to black men on screen involved in any type of IR.
3-You list once more examples of other people who posted stuff about movies with black men in IR relationships with Hispanics and or Asians. Okay, I don't recall the exact examples but I'm not denying it happened. You then whined once more that I didn't pick on those guys but I'm picking on you (are you four years old?). Well, I'm guessing I didn't call out those fellas, if I actually read their posts, because those fellas didn't describe an onscreen relationship between a black man and a non-white woman as being a relationship between a black man and a white woman. Hello? That's it. There's no agenda here, there is no ax to grind, there is no desire to pick on you. You labeled something incorrectly while the other guys didn't. Its just that simple. But I will say that when I saw your post about "Thirsty" with the linked trailer I was genuinely interested in that. Alas it was only a short film and I wanted to make it clear to folks who might have sought it out eventually at the movie theaters or on Blu Ray. When I also noticed you mistakenly refer Waves as having a bm/ww romance, I actually thought to myself I hope darkcurry didn't think I was picking on him. But then I followed it up by thinking to myself that you are an adult and you would understand I was only clarifying the information. Boy, did I give you too much credit. How fragile is your ego, man? You actually thought that was personal when it wasn't. But I doubt you can be convinced otherwise so I won't bother. What I will say in my defense at least is that you repeatedly go to threads getting shit wrong. That's the facts. At times you end up jumping the gun and claiming you have spotted a bm/ww hookup on film from afar, only for me or maybe someone else to point out you got it wrong. Its not like I want you to be wrong. I want more of such portrayals to exist on screen. I just wish you would stop spreading what turns out to be false information. Is that too hard? I guess so.
As for Deadline....there is something real off in your reaction to that whole thing and my take. Pay attention once more. I'm not denying that they made an error and I'm not denying they have to give a retraction. What I argue against is that there was some malicious intent on their part when an editor chose that title (and by the way the story and title emerged AFTER controversy started to brew on social media). You have the audacity to tell me to provide you proof when you have zero proof on the intentions of the Deadline website. Can you read the minds of the folks over there? You took the low road and just assumed Deadline was trying to discredit the film intentionally, purposefully and cruelly. Where's your proof of that? That's a site dedicated to reporting on the business of the entertainment industry s far as Film, TV and stage are concerned and has never had the rep of maliciously trying to savage a project. Can you find any examples of them ever doing such a thing? I doubt it. There reputation is very good within the industry. The article in question was for the most part even-handed' and spelled things out better. It was the title that was misleading and titles are usually determined by a single editor. How are you any better than the other side who jumped to all the wrong conclusions about the movie when you did the same thing regarding the website Deadline which was reporting on it? You can feel all you want that the website was intentionally lying about the film but such currency would get you nowhere in the court of law. You are lacking proof.
And please if you respond to any of this try doing so without losing your shit this time. You are a grown ass man acting as if someone on this site is out to get you. That's absurd.