Women Damaged by Gay Father growing up.
- Thread starter Mandingo Warrior
- Start date
- Status
TreePixie
New Member
Misogyny is not limited to straight men. Women can be misogynists, as can gay men, because it's impossible to avoid the way we status men and women in this society.
As for the bath house commentary, the problem was NOT that he discussed gay sex at the breakfast table. It's that discussion of a parent's sex life, gay *OR* straight, is not appropriate with a young child. It is nothing to do with his gayness, but rather with his inability to draw boundaries, which is a problem many parents have regardless of orientation.
TreePixie
New Member
I'm surprised you didn't know this - I learned this in a freshman high school history class way back in the 70s when homosexuality was far less accepted. The writings of Phaedrus and Xenophon were particularly on point. Some Spartans abhorred the practice as they felt it wasn't based on talent.
Phillip II of Macedon constructed a monument to the Sacred Band of Thebes, warrior group made up entirely of pairs of lovers, and an incredibly effective fighting group. Epaminondas, considered the finest warrior statesmen of ancient Thebes was actually buried with one of his lovers. Aristogiton and Harmodius, often credited with the downfall of tyranny in Athens and the rise of democracy, were a warrior-lover pair considered emblematic of the city.
There's a reason that homosexuality has long been known, in the form of anal sex, as "Greek Love."
TreePixie
New Member
Hair. Box of hair.
Mandingo Warrior
Restricted
.............................................
Last edited:
Morning Star
Well-Known Member
The point being is that we don't need to rely on instinct to survive. And we don't need to have claws or raw strength to demonstrate survival methods since we've continued to evolve mentally. Got it?
You've ignored the whole damn post. You're talking about nonsensical ritualistic methods which is utter bullshit. There's no NEED to "honor" them and the notion of them being sacred is crap as well. They understood the means of survival and they all believed in cookie-cutter spirituality. How difficult is that? Stick to the damn post and stop nit-picking.
No they are NOT. WE, as people, conceived the idea of them being sacred. Just like every other concept known to existence (God, spirits, ghosts), all were concocted by us. Ever thought why those ideas came to be? It's because people back in the day held more animist view points or naturist ideas.
How the hell am I the idiot when you're the one thinking they are animals that are meant to be vilified as sacred? Are you THAT backwards and deluded? Sounds like it to me. They'll die either way and will be nourished in your stomachs. And who's to say that not eating meat isn't healthy? Everyone who claims that it isn't are fucking fools. There are health benefits to eating meat so put away your nonsense on eating nuts and berries.
Yes, it is horrendous. However, humans can be considered food as well and again, it doesn't strengthen your argument since we all have the tendency be selfish. Nothing is sacred and that's true to even human life.
You can say
Hmmmm, didn't bother reading the post carefully. Your rage and blindness is WAY too evident. Ah well, since you need an education lap, here it goes. did Observe the image carefully and you'll see that the Copyu is MUCH closer to to the brown rat.
The link provided give you the similarities between the brown rat and Copyu especially since they are both part of the same family. You've failed to demonstrate how Copyu and Beavers are one and the same. You're simply going by looks, but a Copyu can't be a beaver since a beaver has a flat used to build dams. See, you're the stupid one here. And if you disregard this bit of information, then you've lost on this one and all you have here is your arrogance.
And for the record, otters aren't related to beavers, nor copyu. Again, you FAILED.
Nutria rat.
No jackass. They would still cause problems within the ecosystem from it's place of origin. They are creatures that create problems within the ecosystem, hence they are dangerous pests. What the hell are you doing defending parasites?
Again, your delusional ass took a VERY exaggerated turn for the worse. My point was proven from that thread not simply by the amount of passion of Casey Anthony person (after all, you wanted to kill her yourself), but after the trial, you continued to post updates about her. And where was I? Oh I made one comment about the look-a-like. And you think that constitutes me caring as much as you do? Unless you're Casey Anthony whom I'd shag, then I wouldn't bother. Unlike you, I've let go. And going by that one post means nothing.
I have gotten my information right. It's that YOU failed biology and only judge the creatures by LOOKS as oppose to biological taxidermy. I've even provided you information on their scientific classifications and you still ignored that. That's a sign of a coward who won't admit that she's wrong.
And this is the best you can do? Hahahahahah, I'm laughing over here. Making an ass out of yourself is what you're good at. And remember, we're both nuts, you're right. But I'm an eccentric nut, whereas you, are a psychotic nut and in this case, you're the one with mental problems here.
You've ignored the whole damn post. You're talking about nonsensical ritualistic methods which is utter bullshit. There's no NEED to "honor" them and the notion of them being sacred is crap as well. They understood the means of survival and they all believed in cookie-cutter spirituality. How difficult is that? Stick to the damn post and stop nit-picking.
No they are NOT. WE, as people, conceived the idea of them being sacred. Just like every other concept known to existence (God, spirits, ghosts), all were concocted by us. Ever thought why those ideas came to be? It's because people back in the day held more animist view points or naturist ideas.
How the hell am I the idiot when you're the one thinking they are animals that are meant to be vilified as sacred? Are you THAT backwards and deluded? Sounds like it to me. They'll die either way and will be nourished in your stomachs. And who's to say that not eating meat isn't healthy? Everyone who claims that it isn't are fucking fools. There are health benefits to eating meat so put away your nonsense on eating nuts and berries.
Yes, it is horrendous. However, humans can be considered food as well and again, it doesn't strengthen your argument since we all have the tendency be selfish. Nothing is sacred and that's true to even human life.
You can say
You're full of shit. Pure, stink shit. Funniest ish Ive read from you so far!
Hmmmm, didn't bother reading the post carefully. Your rage and blindness is WAY too evident. Ah well, since you need an education lap, here it goes. did Observe the image carefully and you'll see that the Copyu is MUCH closer to to the brown rat.
The link provided give you the similarities between the brown rat and Copyu especially since they are both part of the same family. You've failed to demonstrate how Copyu and Beavers are one and the same. You're simply going by looks, but a Copyu can't be a beaver since a beaver has a flat used to build dams. See, you're the stupid one here. And if you disregard this bit of information, then you've lost on this one and all you have here is your arrogance.
And for the record, otters aren't related to beavers, nor copyu. Again, you FAILED.
Nutria rat.
No jackass. They would still cause problems within the ecosystem from it's place of origin. They are creatures that create problems within the ecosystem, hence they are dangerous pests. What the hell are you doing defending parasites?
A pass? So we should blame the rats for eco destruction because greedy humans over-bred them for fur and introduced them to oats of the world they never existed?? What the fuck are you smoking, dude??
Again, your delusional ass took a VERY exaggerated turn for the worse. My point was proven from that thread not simply by the amount of passion of Casey Anthony person (after all, you wanted to kill her yourself), but after the trial, you continued to post updates about her. And where was I? Oh I made one comment about the look-a-like. And you think that constitutes me caring as much as you do? Unless you're Casey Anthony whom I'd shag, then I wouldn't bother. Unlike you, I've let go. And going by that one post means nothing.
I have gotten my information right. It's that YOU failed biology and only judge the creatures by LOOKS as oppose to biological taxidermy. I've even provided you information on their scientific classifications and you still ignored that. That's a sign of a coward who won't admit that she's wrong.
And this is the best you can do? Hahahahahah, I'm laughing over here. Making an ass out of yourself is what you're good at. And remember, we're both nuts, you're right. But I'm an eccentric nut, whereas you, are a psychotic nut and in this case, you're the one with mental problems here.
vanilla2chai
New Member
This MW is sick. Seriously sick.
Morning Star
Well-Known Member
I won't deny her experiences were horrendous. And yes, people do handle them differently. As for single parent homes, be it fatherless or motherless, economic and social upbringing could also factor into their behavior. I've known some people who didn't have fathers and many of them are mentally healthy.
Sexual deviant behavior and carelessness are universal. I doubt specifying certain kinds would be any more significant. In her case, she was caught with overly sexed bad parents.
It's not an attack. Her personal experience basically turned her into a bigot because she thinks all gay parents are like that. It'd be different if she was advocating good parenting. But she's basically attacking homosexuality as though it will cause problems.
Reading it fundamental, but that's not working well for you at all, not just with this, but also the copyu and beaver constrast as well. You're completely disregarding or belittling the entire point of the experiment. Why don't you prove those very individuals wrong about their findings? You simply can't because you rather run on conviction rather than understanding science. You are a little shit at times. You probably have a severe case of ADD.
Erections aren't triggered simply by observation. We can THINK on certain sexual thoughts collected from something we are aroused by. Geez, what sort of stupid ass question is that? Know your damn psychology.
That's another poor example for many reasons. And since you never breastfed anyone in your life, nor you have a strong foundation on how it works, I'll explain to you in simple terms. A mom breastfeeding her kid is not a sign of sexual arousal, though the nipples erect. This is her period when milk is being secreted from there for the baby to suckle on. Again, you have no grasp on human anatomy nor sexuality.
Who's the dumbass now?
That's your nickname. Pay attention.
If you still believe you can change sexual orientation, then you're incredibly stupid to believe that. Sexual orientation cannot be changed nor altered. But, it can be suppressed. What part of it are you ignoring?
Of course you can change your orientation. Get the fuck out of here. He said that he was forced into homosexuality at a young age to begin with, so he became one, all the while living as a gay man, he didn't feel it was right. He decided his love for God was much more powerful than anything he felt towards men. Read the damn book or watch his interview. As I said, he was interesting to listen to.
Show me the article. And I'll at least concede this one.
A little hint: Politicians hide their sexuality in order to get ahead in their careers. Many parts of the country and their districts can be pretty against homosexuality and LGBT rights. This is a given. It's similar to how porn stars or actors engage in interracial themed movies and they lose popularity. It's a common thing found.
Keep believing that and I may give you mince meat pie out of dog organs. Mmmmm...dog meat! Seriously, are you THAT paranoid and guarded?
I never posted porn links here, so I don't know where the hell do you get that from. And secondly, it's VERY rare that I would provide links like that on every topic. Again, paranoia won't build your credibility. It'll only make you look more like a fool.
Sexual deviant behavior and carelessness are universal. I doubt specifying certain kinds would be any more significant. In her case, she was caught with overly sexed bad parents.
It's not an attack. Her personal experience basically turned her into a bigot because she thinks all gay parents are like that. It'd be different if she was advocating good parenting. But she's basically attacking homosexuality as though it will cause problems.
Reading it fundamental, but that's not working well for you at all, not just with this, but also the copyu and beaver constrast as well. You're completely disregarding or belittling the entire point of the experiment. Why don't you prove those very individuals wrong about their findings? You simply can't because you rather run on conviction rather than understanding science. You are a little shit at times. You probably have a severe case of ADD.
WTF? Reading is fundamental! I said EXACTLY what you just said. I never said anything about what they "spoke". I noted their stimulus penis reaction. Fuck you're an utter dumb-ass. I'm so done with you after this!
Erections aren't triggered simply by observation. We can THINK on certain sexual thoughts collected from something we are aroused by. Geez, what sort of stupid ass question is that? Know your damn psychology.
That's another poor example for many reasons. And since you never breastfed anyone in your life, nor you have a strong foundation on how it works, I'll explain to you in simple terms. A mom breastfeeding her kid is not a sign of sexual arousal, though the nipples erect. This is her period when milk is being secreted from there for the baby to suckle on. Again, you have no grasp on human anatomy nor sexuality.
Who's the dumbass now?
That's your nickname. Pay attention.
If you still believe you can change sexual orientation, then you're incredibly stupid to believe that. Sexual orientation cannot be changed nor altered. But, it can be suppressed. What part of it are you ignoring?
Of course you can change your orientation. Get the fuck out of here. He said that he was forced into homosexuality at a young age to begin with, so he became one, all the while living as a gay man, he didn't feel it was right. He decided his love for God was much more powerful than anything he felt towards men. Read the damn book or watch his interview. As I said, he was interesting to listen to.
Show me the article. And I'll at least concede this one.
A little hint: Politicians hide their sexuality in order to get ahead in their careers. Many parts of the country and their districts can be pretty against homosexuality and LGBT rights. This is a given. It's similar to how porn stars or actors engage in interracial themed movies and they lose popularity. It's a common thing found.
Keep believing that and I may give you mince meat pie out of dog organs. Mmmmm...dog meat! Seriously, are you THAT paranoid and guarded?
I never posted porn links here, so I don't know where the hell do you get that from. And secondly, it's VERY rare that I would provide links like that on every topic. Again, paranoia won't build your credibility. It'll only make you look more like a fool.
Inner Beauty
New Member
Woman (singular) and women (plural).
TreePixie
New Member
And dumb as a box of hair. No question. He's still avoiding providing proof for all sorts of weird ass claims in another thread. Because, naturally, he can't. Because I countered him with logic and proof, I've been called all sorts of things, from "unwed mother" (as though there was something wrong with that, but I'm not) to "black woman" to threats that black men like him won't like me if I have an opinion of my own. (Oh...NOEZ!! What shall I do, says I, wringing my hands!! Some bigot won't LIKE me!!! Oh dear, oh dear, how horrible for a woman!). He claimed native Americans dont exist and that ALL religions use the ten commandments.
He's a waste of space
...??
He was detected from the get-go, & I think he should've been banned already.
This thread is another pile of shit dumped on the board by ol' Dingdong, & IMO there's no doubt that he's a punk ass white boy.
Yep.
I was thinking the same thing, IB, but it's a lesson wasted on this inbred fool.
Ol'Skool Classic
Well-Known Member
- Status