I have posted this already, but here you go.
In the United Kingdom, access by the general public to firearms is tightly controlled by law, although this is less restrictive in Northern Ireland. The United Kingdom has one of the lowest rates of gun homicides in the world.[1] There were 0.05 recorded intentional homicides committed with a firearm per 100,000 inhabitants in the five years to 2011 (15 to 38 people per annum)
Very few other places actually don't allow people to have a gun, even Brazil and Mexico who you quoted earlier allows the general public to have a gun.
But I found South Korea which seems to have very strict rules around firearms.
South Korea[edit]
South Korea has one of the most restrictive gun policies in the developed world. Hunting and sporting licenses are issued, but any firearm used in these circumstances must be stored at a local police station. Violation of firearms law can result in a $(US)18,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.
Despite the strict regulations, the vast majority of South Korean males are well trained in the use of firearms, due to the mandatory military service required of all male citizens.[63]
While private firearm ownership in South Korea is exceptionally rare, there have been notable instances of firearm-related mass casualty incidents, most notably the Uiryeong massacre, which was the deadliest lone-gunman massacre until the 2011 Norway attacks. Despite this, gun culture is notably absent in South Korean society outside of the military and police, and gun ownership and deaths rank amongst the lowest in the world.[64][65]
Australia
Australia[edit]
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2015)
Main article: Gun politics in Australia
Firearm laws in Australia are enforced at a Federal (via customs controls)[citation needed] and State level (all other forms of control). Gun ownership is accessible to the civilian population, and owners must comply with 'genuine reasons' to obtain a Permit to Acquire from their State government. For rifles, genuine reasons focus on either hunting and/or sport/target shooting, and do not include personal protection. Handgun licenses are also available, and applied for separately. In New South Wales, and similarly in other states, firearm ownership is widely prohibited for convicted offenders or those with a history of mental illness. Gun licenses must be renewed either annually or every 5 years, and expire automatically if not renewed.
Firearm control was in place prior to the 1996 Port Arthur massacre. However, in its aftermath the major political parties implemented additional and extensive gun-control legislation, this fueled the development of parties such as the New South Wales Shooters Party, which represent deregulation.[citation needed]
In 1996, then Australian Prime Minister, John Howard personally drove through legislation restricting a variety of firearm classes including semi-automatic rifles and shotguns, pump action shotguns holding more than 5 rounds (in some states). Knives, pocket knives and lasers over one milliwatt are classed as weapons in most parts of Australia.[citation needed] The American Journal of Law and Economics reported in 2010 that firearm homicides in Australia dropped 59 percent between 1995 and 2006. In the 18 years before the 1996 laws, there were 13 gun massacres resulting in 102 deaths, according to Harvard researchers.[133]
There are some figures for you.
Now you bring me some figures to prove how personal gun ownership improves the safety of your fellow Americans, how many people (numbers please) are saved every year by keeping personal firearms.
Where they have prevented injury to the owner of the legal firearm, in real live threat situations, not would have... could have happened.
