Why Are White Women Obsessed With Weight?

Thanx for the support mistress B, I've really gotta stop spamming this thread.

Well my first degree, development studies, is about the causes of unequal development and introducing and analysing sustainable policies of equity (yes, idealistic but we have to try). It focusses on globalisation processes from a number of perspectives, including urban and regional impacts, economic impacts and cultural diversity.

My second degree is Law. My strong interest is international law but my actual specialty was Family.
 
MistressB said:
Nice response leksie, very calm and classy - who cares what an idiot on the internet thinks of you anyway? What were your degrees in? Sounds interesting.

interent should be capitalised - Internet.

Just for fun, I've picked a choice selection of 7Seven's nonsense phrases and graded them for him:


I am use to constructing broad concepts to men whom understand broad concepts and does not need me to spell out every concept like a 12 year old girl. - (used; men WHO; do)

No. who is only used here when a nominative pronoun such as I or he would be appropriate. I am speaking in a plural sense here. To whom is the object of the verb which is men whom understand broad concepts. The form of used is incorrect here also because I am not speaking in past tense.

What cheap shots did I give that wasn't taken first!? - (weren't)

Ok! You are right about that one.

You see you even lack the metacognitive skills necessary to evaluate a sentence. Making your assertion SHIT MATE. (you can't start a sentence with Making)

Said who!?

To lack the former is to be deficient in the latter. Which you are, and which to that you can deduce my broad concepts. (these are broken clauses; the latter cannot possibly be a sentence in its own right)

:lol: there are no broken clauses here, because it describes the behaviour of the previous sentence. Sentence A is a complete thought on its own, which then follows its original thesis.

I do it purposely! (on purpose?)

No. With one specific purpose - purposely!

Which of course still does not take away from any of my arguments as people have been able to logically deduce simply for them to understand. (this is nonsensical)

This is not even an idea, it is a FACT. :lol: This ignorance you are displaying is unbecoming for an Cambridge grad, you do not even understand the denotation and connotation of words -- which is pathetic.

Then further, to alpha males, concurrently it is about my ability to formulate proper grammatical sentences. (you needed a semi colon, and currently, not concurrently)

Firstly, semicolon is a complete word and neither of these clauses are independent which is why I used concurrently -- to show the relationship. It explains the way this topic as digressed to trivial manners -- like your ignorance and hypocrisy.

On another factoid...the average lawyer's IQ is only 103! The greater ones have an IQ of 126+, which I am beginning to doubt it is incumbent onto you. You would make a bad secretary and a horrible lawyer.

XX[/quote]
 
I would hate to keep this blame party goin', but here I go:

7Seven,

It seems that in the majority of your posts on the site, you start off with a blunt assertion, and then run on that when someone replies to you, only for you to misspell certain words, use incorrect pronunciation, and even misspell the screen names of other members on the site, not to mention your constant diagnosis diatribes, about how other members are, and what they say to you on the site, which seems to be a common trend with you here. You don't have to recite what 'rules' are to be played in a debate, and what someone else is always 'doing wrong' in every one of your messages to them.



Sengo,

You keep saying that leksie is back tracking, but you continue to put words in her mouth about what she says and how she means it, causing her to explain over and over again, what she was saying to you, and so far, you and 7Seven have been much more emotional than she has been throughout this overly digressed thread. I did, and still do agree with most of your points, but they are all, for the last time, misdirected, and venting on leksie doesn't change what you've been though with other white women(foreign or not) so I don't understand what you are hoping to accomplish here.



Leksie,

The problem with what you say is that you feel the need to justify everything you say to Sengo, hoping to explain again and again, what you mean, when you have already made it clear that you don't feel comfortable with a black man who resents black women because of their personal encounters with black women, and that's fine, but if you ever meet a black man who DOES resent black women, do NOT assume that he's just 'being an ass because he craves white women'. Most of these guys who have had one bad experience after another with black women are actually telling the truth, but there are quite a few (Jaydun, flaminghetero, black prince, etc.) who like to exaggerate what they say about black women, however, it doesn't cancel out the points they make regardless, and 7Seven himself actually agrees with me on that note. Also, there are white women who have had VERY SIMILAR experiences with black women, that a lot of black men have had, but when they speak out about it, it is accepted, but when black men speak out about it, they are constantly criticized, made to feel defeated, and self-loathing, so much to the point that many brothas become just as pussy-whipped by white women, as much as tons of white men do (but that's usually the white men's fault), and are often too 'chicken shit' to even stand up to them, whenever the white women get out of line somehow in some way, but this same thing also goes for black men who deal with black women, whom they so-call 'bash', but if I had a dime for all the black women in the world WHO ARE WORSE in their bashing, but LOVE to project it, then I would have a good amount of change saved up for a rainy day.

Not enough American black women/men keep in mind the success rate of same-color black couples, versus white ones.

The truth of the matter is, no matter what or how a black man goes about anything in life, he's damned if he does, and damned if he doesn't, and because so many brothas don't know how to deal with it, arguments like these surface over and over again, and these arguments get NO ONE everywhere.
 
7Seven,

It seems that in the majority of your posts on the site, you start off with a blunt assertion, and then run on that when someone replies to you, only for you to misspell certain words, use incorrect pronunciation, and even misspell the screen names of other members on the site, not to mention your constant diagnosis diatribes, about how other members are, and what they say to you on the site, which seems to be a common trend with you here. You don't have to recite what 'rules' are to be played in a debate, and what someone else is always 'doing wrong' in every one of your messages to them.

Quite. I'm afraid, 7Seven, no matter what superior forms of intellect you might claim to possess, you have not the skills in English to be able to express them correctly and concisely. However much you may attempt to bash me on scores of IQ, the relative superiority of Oxford over Cambridge and, most predictably, my lack of ability as a woman, this remains the truth.
 
MistressB said:
7Seven,

It seems that in the majority of your posts on the site, you start off with a blunt assertion, and then run on that when someone replies to you, only for you to misspell certain words, use incorrect pronunciation, and even misspell the screen names of other members on the site, not to mention your constant diagnosis diatribes, about how other members are, and what they say to you on the site, which seems to be a common trend with you here. You don't have to recite what 'rules' are to be played in a debate, and what someone else is always 'doing wrong' in every one of your messages to them.

Quite. I'm afraid, 7Seven, no matter what superior forms of intellect you might claim to possess, you have not the skills in English to be able to express them correctly and concisely. However much you may attempt to bash me on scores of IQ, the relative superiority of Oxford over Cambridge and, most predictably, my lack of ability as a woman, this remains the truth.

(In best alien robot voice)

The trigger word "truth" has been detected in the above post! :shock:


Convoluted Philosophical Diatribes imminent! :cry:

Raise FRONTAL LOBE SHIELDS NOW!
:roll:
 
SardonicGenie said:
I would hate to keep this blame party goin', but here I go:

7Seven,

It seems that in the majority of your posts on the site, you start off with a blunt assertion, and then run on that when someone replies to you, only for you to misspell certain words, use incorrect pronunciation, and even misspell the screen names of other members on the site, not to mention your constant diagnosis diatribes, about how other members are, and what they say to you on the site, which seems to be a common trend with you here. You don't have to recite what 'rules' are to be played in a debate, and what someone else is always 'doing wrong' in every one of your messages to them.

:lol: If people attack the argument in itself and not the man then we do not have this problem -- Do we SardonicGenie!? Please, like just did to MissB, show where I misspelled words and use incorrect pronunciation.

MistressB said:
Quite. I'm afraid, 7Seven, no matter what superior forms of intellect you might claim to possess, you have not the skills in English to be able to express them correctly and concisely. However much you may attempt to bash me on scores of IQ, the relative superiority of Oxford over Cambridge and, most predictably, my lack of ability as a woman, this remains the truth.

Really!? Haven't I already deduce your ignorance regarding my usage of English; I already displayed you do not understand the connotation and denotation of words. Alright, so I do not sit around here all day, like you seem to and make my concepts completely simplistic, but that is irrelevant. Also, Cambridge is a far more prestigious University than Oxford and I expect more from you, than the other posters.
 
7Seven said:
The worst kind of hypocrisy, is the hypocrite whom doesn't recognise their own hypocrisy. Its what I call "Stupidity Hypocrisy's" or "Ignorant Stupidity." The more incompetent a person is at a given skill, the less likely they are to realise it because they also lack the metacognitive skills necessary to evaluate their performance. Ignorance really is bliss, except for those who are faced with the task of trying to explain to a person, whom maybe extremely knowledgeable, that their arguments aren’t so good after all.

This is what we have with SengO versus leskie and you. He exposed your hypocrisy and now you can not handle it and refuse to see it. You defend a position simply by refusing to acknowledge the force of Sengo's argument.

For one, it is an impossibility for any of us to "ask your friends." Making that assertion the "Straw Man's" argument, which is irrelevant to the hypocrisy you display. Number two, you are misrepresenting the facts by stating which "type" of BM approaches you; I guarantee this though.....the black men who approaches you and the one you are with are not of the superlative type.

The superlative black male would be more interested in women like T2, Spellon, Misvoskca, Silvercomsa, etc.... Of course you will never be able to recognise the difference, but that is what it is......

This is an example of what Miss B pointed out before about the structure of your messages.
 
7Seven said:
:lol: Clearly, MissB and SD have no problem deducing my posts, really, maybe you should work on YOUR English. Show me a sentence you cannot understand or ask me to explain it instead of taking shots. So lets realise this fact....I know you have little knowledge on broad concepts and it intimidates you. God is Truth correct!? and that is all you need to know correct!? so pay my post no mind.....IT IS THAT SIMPLE REALLY!

But, as of now, you stated that MissB couldn't deduce your posts, and whenever you should use a 'z' in a word, you replace it with an 's.' Sometimes you fail to use correct capitalization whenever it is needed in some of the first letters of your sentences, and the way your tone of speaking comes off in your posts, makes it seem like you are rushing to write them all the time.
 
7Seven said:
There is no difference in "superlative" and "alpha" they both connote the same thing, which is high quality. Also, I have explained in depth what constitutes an alpha male, and how other men try to emulate its functioning "Player theory" aka "Game theory" in another one of these topics, but I haven't the time to look for it.

This one is another good example of your wording skills.
 
SardonicGenie said:
7Seven said:
The worst kind of hypocrisy, is the hypocrite whom doesn't recognise their own hypocrisy. Its what I call "Stupidity Hypocrisy's" or "Ignorant Stupidity." The more incompetent a person is at a given skill, the less likely they are to realise it because they also lack the metacognitive skills necessary to evaluate their performance. Ignorance really is bliss, except for those who are faced with the task of trying to explain to a person, whom maybe extremely knowledgeable, that their arguments aren’t so good after all.

This is what we have with SengO versus leskie and you. He exposed your hypocrisy and now you can not handle it and refuse to see it. You defend a position simply by refusing to acknowledge the force of Sengo's argument.

For one, it is an impossibility for any of us to "ask your friends." Making that assertion the "Straw Man's" argument, which is irrelevant to the hypocrisy you display. Number two, you are misrepresenting the facts by stating which "type" of BM approaches you; I guarantee this though.....the black men who approaches you and the one you are with are not of the superlative type.

The superlative black male would be more interested in women like T2, Spellon, Misvoskca, Silvercomsa, etc.... Of course you will never be able to recognise the difference, but that is what it is......

This is an example of what Miss B pointed out before about the structure of your messages.

The only thing I can see with the first assertion, is that, I do not make my concept simple -- "Ignorant Stupidity' or "Stupidity Hypocrisy's." The explanation shows that people generally do not recognise their own hypocrisy when making general statements; which she did and Sengo pointed it out. Of course, she interpreted as an attack and made other irrelevant statements regarding my character -- which digressed the topic even further. With the last assertion -- really, how important is it for me spell the words of an poster's name!? Perhaps, they should simplify their names for easier spelling.... Or am I the only person that needs to be simple? I remember some time ago, JohnMP accusing me of being to simplistic for an Oxford grad -- now, I being too broad.
 
7Seven said:
:lol: I do state what constitutes an alpha male here:

I thought that at first, you didn't believe in alpha males (according to the posts you wrote in solar flair's thread asking 'What's all this stuff about an alpha male?' somewhere around here). And, AN alpha male???


Or are you trying to redefine what is an alpha male to suit the traits found in your bloke!? But lets realise your accounts of an alpha males are emotional....

Oookay...
 
@LEKSIE,

assuming it didn't come from a mill, the so-called degree you "earned" is not even worth toilet paper it was written with. You are just a complete ass, a hypocrite, and liberal slash closet racist who will continue to see the world from her little pedestal slash podium.

:twisted:

CASE CLOSED.


@SARDONIC

on what you said regarding emotional reactions and backtracking, i will agree to disagree.... if anything, it's my writing style, and backtracking is just repeating the same thing but trying to justify what they said the second go around. all i did was explore their hypocrisy and counter their blatant generalisations, in so many ways.

to me, and hopefully others, women like these are just full of it, and really just trying to brag about their endless supply of black man hitting on them, and then somehow pass it off as humility.

come on man, do the math here - if they live, work, and play in majority white inhabited areas and it's still more black man than others that hit on them as they claim, it only means that white man and other man don't find them attractive enough to approach. or maybe they see them with a black guy and see what they're all about it and don't approach them.

but it doesn't matter, 'cus the black man is just TOOO thrilled with the left overs and egomaniacal (LOL, love them big words) basket cases of other races, no matter how hypocritcal and narrow their views of us as BM are

:wink:

just something to think about... i'm done with this topic

CASE CLOSED
 
7Seven said:
The only thing I can see with the first assertion, is that, I do not make my concept simple --

A period goes at the end of this sentence.


"Ignorant Stupidity' or "Stupidity Hypocrisy's."

There is no such thing is ignorant stupidity. Ignorance and stupidity go hand and hand. You mean to say 'Stupid Hypocrises.'


The explanation shows that people generally do not recognise their own hypocrisy when making general statements;

Comma here, not semi-colon.


which she did and Sengo pointed it out. Of course, she interpreted as an attack and made other irrelevant statements regarding my character --

She was mainly defending leksie when Sengo attacked her.


which digressed the topic even further. With the last assertion -- really, how important is it for me spell the words of an poster's name!? Perhaps, they should simplify their names for easier spelling.... Or am I the only person that needs to be simple? I remember some time ago, JohnMP accusing me of being to simplistic for an Oxford grad -- now, I being too broad.

Oh, com' on, dude.
 
SENGO_G said:
@LEKSIE,

assuming it didn't come from a mill, the so-called degree you "earned" is not even worth toilet paper it was written with. You are just a complete ass, a hypocrite, and liberal slash closet racist who will continue to see the world from her little pedestal slash podium.

:twisted:

CASE CLOSED.


@SARDONIC

on what you said regarding emotional reactions and backtracking, i will agree to disagree.... if anything, it's my writing style, and backtracking is just repeating the same thing but trying to justify what they said the second go around.

to me, and hopefully others, women like these are just full of it, and really trying to bragging about their endless supply of black man hitting on them, and then somehow pass it off as humility.

come on man, do the math here - if they live, work, and play in majority white inhabited areas and it's still more black man than others that hit on them as they claim, it only means that white man and other man don't find them attractive enough to approach. or maybe they see them with a black guy and see what they're all about it and don't approach them.

You're jumping to conclusions again.


but it doesn't matter, 'cus the black man is just TOOO thrilled with the left overs and egomaniacal (LOL, love them big words) basket cases of other races, no matter how hypocritcal and narrow their views of us as BM are

:wink:

just something to think about... i'm done with this topic

CASE CLOSED

I've already done the math, this is what it equals up to:

The both of you are SAYING THE EXACT SAME THINGS back and forth to one another, and still arguing like babies about it.
 
We should let this thread die and begin two new ones

1. Angry Black Man Attacks Poor Little White Liberal Hypocrites.

2. Hey dude, It's the grammar, not the ideas.

LOL
 
leksie said:
I'm not fat but I got curve with some booty and chest..and well, quite frankly, the number of white Aussie guys who approach me just don't rate compared to the amount of black guys. Go figure! (literally, hah hah).

I think it's also the Eastern European things, guys from Africa assume I wasn't born in Australia (though I was, my parents weren't) based on my appearance and I think sometimes assume I am more understanding of their situation (which I try my best to be anyway).

I've been in a relationship for more than 3 years with a man and it only seems to have increased since then, seems some less savoury guys wanna assume I'm the woman who will get with anyone so long as he's black :? Which I'm definately not, no way.

Or is it just because they have seen me with my man and no I won't front racism? I don't know...annnnyway off topic !


SENGO_G said:
OH BROTHER!

and what's the african population in australia, like .0007% percent, so i imagined you must have a growing herd of grunting, sweaty african bushmen around you 24-7.

poor baby. I mean, poor AFRICAN. probably trying to keep cool in a 99% NON-BLACK (NOT ABORIGINE) country, when all a sudden he come up by some self-conscious white girl who think ALL BLACK MEN want her because she think she got those curves...

For all we know, you could be like Roseanne Barr, LOL, that's a woman with a BIG BACKSIDE and BIG CHEST...

I find it odd that a joke is what started this whole argument, in fact, you SENGO, were the one who joked first about the white girl with a 'sista booty' getting hit on by black guys all the time.
 
SENGO_G said:
You're jumping to conclusions again.

it still doesn't change the fact they've somehow managed to isolate black men from the equation of attraction.

Maybe that's because of what YOU said when you joked about the white girls with thick butts getting more attention from us than white men, and they actually do, if you think about it.

I've seen white men dating white women with thick butts, but I've seen more of them with black men.
 
I find it odd that a joke is what started this whole argument, in fact, you SENGO, were the one who joked first about the white girl with a 'sista booty' getting hit on by black guys all the time.

All races of men can appreciate a certain shape

For them to isolate black men and attribute all the attention and being hit on it to their so-called shape is overly simplistic, stupid, and... ridiculous

Isn't it a fair generalisation to say that all races and creed men have the potential to appreciate a certain shape, and that a black man's appreciation should not be an ISOLATED INCIDENT, as the leksie, mistressb, and others wish to make it.....

COME ON MAN, YOU CAN COME BETTER THAN THAT
 
Back
Top Bottom