Why Are White Women Obsessed With Weight?

MistressB said:
7Seven said:
tuckerreed said:
ok two posts that make little sense.

Mistress? presume what? I called you fine and said you know it, whats to presume--you are too intelligent to not know what I said.


7seven:
dude, what language are you speaking, can you make a clear english sentence without trying to add words to make it sound like you are intellectual? just talk plainly and we can tell whether you are smart or not.

:lol: Clearly, MissB and SD have no problem deducing my posts, really, maybe you should work on YOUR English. Show me a sentence you cannot understand or ask me to explain it instead of taking shots. So lets realise this fact....I know you have little knowledge on broad concepts and it intimidates you. God is Truth correct!? and that is all you need to know correct!? so pay my post no mind.....IT IS THAT SIMPLE REALLY!

To be fair, your grammar and sentence structure is awful - but I've had to mark and comprehend the work of children in grade school, so I can decipher it just fine!

:lol: More cheap shots! :lol: :lol: Please pick out a sentence of mine and explain to me how awful it is, because I haven't the time to sit and reread over and over what I type here, that is what I have Secretaries for, you know your type of work(grading children's work), womyn's work, whilst I concoct and use my spiral intelligence for strategic plans for the future of a multi billion dollar company. It is not my fault you can not read, understand, and construct logical deductions. I am use to constructing broad concepts to men whom understand broad concepts and does not need me to spell out every concept like a 12 year old girl.
 
Secretaries?

That must be it. 7Seven must been a professor in the past....My guess is philosophy or social science.
 
where is the broad concepts you speak of?? you just have run on sentences, and diahrea of the mouth. If you have a secretary then have her teach you where to place a full stop(period). Without proper punctuation, one cannot make sense of what you just said, sir.

all the deductive reasoning, circle logic makes no logical sense without clearly stating oneself. anyone can run on and on about anything. pick a topic, make a statement, ask a question and let others give their opinion and then you can give yours.

and you were giving cheap shots and rude comments toward Mistress, sir.

stay on topic and we can have a discussion.
 
tuckerreed said:
where is the broad concepts you speak of?? you just have run on sentences, and diahrea of the mouth. If you have a secretary then have her teach you where to place a full stop(period). Without proper punctuation, one cannot make sense of what you just said, sir.

all the deductive reasoning, circle logic makes no logical sense without clearly stating oneself. anyone can run on and on about anything. pick a topic, make a statement, ask a question and let others give their opinion and then you can give yours.

and you were giving cheap shots and rude comments toward Mistress, sir.

stay on topic and we can have a discussion.

:lol: What cheap shots did I give that wasn't taken first!?

A period is only needed when I have reach conclusion of a full thought which I haven't. You see you even lack the metacognitive skills necessary to evaluate a sentence. Making your assertion SHIT MATE. In short, the same knowledge that underlies the ability to produce correct judgment is also the knowledge that underlies the ability to recognise correct judgment. To lack the former is to be deficient in the latter. Which you are, and which to that you can deduce my broad concepts. I do it purposely! I think the only person that was able to pick up on this is laninan, my guess, her vocation and an Professor allows her to see the difference.
 
You also do not understand deductive arguments. In Deduction the major premise is a RULE which asserts that there is a relationship between one class of objects and another. If the rule is false, then there is no such relationship, i.e. the two classes are irrelevant to each other. Hence, if the major premise is false, the minor premise is irrelevant to the conclusion.

Not being "clear" and simple is not of my problem, the problem lies with you not being able to deduce a broad concept. You try to attack the man because he is not being as simple minded as you want him to be. Obviously peppering an opponent with irrelevant insults does nothing to address the soundness of the opponent's argument. You try to mimic contexts in which concern for the character or characteristics of my person is relevant i.e. not being simple enough, poor sentence structure, etc. Which of course still does not take away from any of my arguments as people have been able to logically deduce simply for them to understand.

In my world we call this intellectual myopia. Understanding the difference between denotation and connotation is important to understanding definitions and how concepts are used.
 
make a point or stop flapping your gums. Deductive reasoning has to first has a subject, which you have not created so please give us all a break and pipe down.

everyone knows what you are saying, NOTHING. It doesnt take a PHD to understand a child using a textbook to try to impress one person who isnt even online--lain.

a period is needed at the end of a sentence, a full stop. you use run on sentences because you are a windbag, who loves to hear himself blather on.

stick to the topic, please and deduce, analyze, circle logically, just stick to the topic.
 
tuckerreed said:
make a point or stop flapping your gums. Deductive reasoning has to first has a subject, which you have not created so please give us all a break and pipe down.

everyone knows what you are saying, NOTHING. It doesnt take a PHD to understand a child using a textbook to try to impress one person who isnt even online--lain.

a period is needed at the end of a sentence, a full stop. you use run on sentences because you are a windbag, who loves to hear himself blather on.

stick to the topic, please and deduce, analyze, circle logically, just stick to the topic.

The subject was white women being obsessed with being overweight, but it digressed to white women showmanship of hypocrisy. Then further, to alpha males, concurrently it is about my ability to formulate proper grammatical sentences. I am simply explaining the concepts I choose to make a sentence that you just can not accept.
 
Part of this conversation stems from the fact that you guys, primarily in the states, are coming from IR in a different manner than what we would here in Australia.

You might get the odd racist dissaproval but we don't have the long (and yes, important to understand) history of slavery and the dimaterics which have consequently stemmed from that. So there isn't these motivators about the liberals assuaging their guilt (though that is an interesting point), the dialects on self-hate, opression and all the other things that are important in the states about stemming the racial divide.

Because most of our black Australians are African in the first sense, ususually only up until second generation, their histories are primarily paralell, rather than intertwined with the rest of Australian history- though hopefully as more people migrate here- that is happening in a positive way.

So to be honest, all these scripts about white women thinking they are looked at by every black man (who they pathetically and sadly seem to assume are no longer interested in black women, or men who sometimes might not be for one reason or another) is not something I can relate to at all. It's not something that informs IR relationships between black men/women here. I think that partly explains our different perspectives, I don't mean this in an accusatory way, but I guess there has been less time for a trench of bitterness where thing can be misinterpreted to have developed (as compared to what has happened with our Aboriginal people, for example- you could probably compare those race relations in many ways even though they are totally different situations)!

It's important to understand your man's culture and history but to me if you care about someone, that's it.
 
SENGO_G said:
white woman says

"more black guy give me that "look" than white"
"black guys hit on me more than white"
"my mother and sister and friend had the same experience with black men"

VERSUS

black man says

"more black woman than white act all sassy and have attitude"
"more black woman than white don't find me attractive"
"my brother my male friends have the same experience with black woman"

IS ALL ONE IN THE DAMN SAME..... SO GIVE IT UP

NO, it's not the same because one is negative justification (about BW) and one is positive justification.

I would never want to be with a BM who had negative attitudes towards BW.I can appreciate and love all types of men (though not at the same time, hah hah) and would expect him to be the same. It just seems healthier to me.
 
SardonicGenie said:
All she said was that she didn't want to be in a relationships with a black man who has a bitter outlook on all black women, not black men who prefer white women.

Exactly. I personally can't get beyond the fact that black women are his mother, sisters- future daughter. It just doesn't wash with me regardless of how he has been wronged- I wouldn't judge all white, or black, or brown or whatever men in the same way.

Again, there is alot of cultural interactions going on in the States that we don't have here.

thanks guys by the way for the interesting discussion and those who seem to understand what I am saying.
 
leksie said:
Part of this conversation stems from the fact that you guys, primarily in the states, are coming from IR in a different manner than what we would here in Australia.

No LEKSIE, part of this conversation stems from the fact that you don't know jack about race relations ANYWHERE and should shut your trap before you expose anymore of your racial hypocrisy and inconstinence

It almost amazes me, you come from the same Australia where not more than 4 month ago, five thousand (FIVE THOUSAND) stone drunk racist white boy and girl took the liberty to attack anybody looking remotely middle eastern. All because of what -- White girl like you who say non-whites (in this case LEBANESE) give her dirty looks and approach her more than white......


You might get the odd racist dissaproval but we don't have the long (and yes, important to understand) history of slavery and the dimaterics which have consequently stemmed from that. So there isn't these motivators about the liberals assuaging their guilt (though that is an interesting point), the dialects on self-hate, opression and all the other things that are important in the states about stemming the racial divide.

OHHH PULLEASE. What, was there a "slavery special" on the BBC Channel? Racial divide? Self-hate? LOL..... How cute.

Don't act like the **** do not stink in Australia, pointing to the big bad wolf USA is the classic strategy that racists outside the USA use to justify your hypocrisy and generalisations and actions towards other ethnic groups. It allows a Mexican Presidents to say that the people in US has no business telling Mexicans are racist for putting out caricature stamps. It allows people in your country to say there is no racism or even crime because there are no blacks. Get it?

Because most of our black Australians are African in the first sense, ususually only up until second generation, their histories are primarily paralell, rather than intertwined with the rest of Australian history- though hopefully as more people migrate here- that is happening in a positive way.

So I see, you're the type of white girl who get some Mandigo in you and all of a sudden you're some expert on the so-called African experience.

You talk about Africans as if they're well integrated. How well integrated can .01% of 40 million people be, you just wait when more Africans start arriving in those boats and planes, we'll see how welcome and integrated they become. Besides, I know for a fact from friends who live there, Africans are already largely despised by not only whites, but Asians and Aborigines as well...

So to be honest, all these scripts about white women thinking they are looked at by every black man (who they pathetically and sadly seem to assume are no longer interested in black women, or men who sometimes might not be for one reason or another) is not something I can relate to at all. It's not something that informs IR relationships between black men/women here. I think that partly explains our different perspectives, I don't mean this in an accusatory way, but I guess there has been less time for a trench of bitterness where thing can be misinterpreted to have developed (as compared to what has happened with our Aboriginal people, for example- you could probably compare those race relations in many ways even though they are totally different situations)!

YES, yes, the same old racial hypocrisy and denial from the same white girl who actually thinks her africans friends and african boyfriend, and a TV documentary qualify her to speak on racial issues. WHAT A COMPLETE JOKE.

Continue to back-track all your last statements and reach into the air for something to justify your hypocrisy and denial towards black men.
 
leksie said:
SENGO_G said:
white woman says

"more black guy give me that "look" than white"
"black guys hit on me more than white"
"my mother and sister and friend had the same experience with black men"

VERSUS

black man says

"more black woman than white act all sassy and have attitude"
"more black woman than white don't find me attractive"
"my brother my male friends have the same experience with black woman"

IS ALL ONE IN THE DAMN SAME..... SO GIVE IT UP

NO, it's not the same because one is negative justification (about BW) and one is positive justification.

You will NEVER get it.

Any way you put it, Both set of statement are BROAD, SWEEPING GENERALISATIONS, WITH NO CONTEXT, and do not take into account the person saying them, the environment, their dealing with that group of people that claim to give or not give them attention, and so forth.... POSITIVE and NEGATIVE are ONLY YOUR EMOTIONS about the statements.


MAN, what is making you not attractive in your own race is just really interesting. Many attractive white girl never/seldom get approach by black men, some even beg to be approached, in a country less than 1% black, or a town no more than 5% black, how you claim to get hit on by all the black man (or more black man than white) with no real explanation is just beyond me.

I just don't know any guy with sense who want a woman or man not considered attractive by people their own race, unless they desparate, or have a serious type of complex.
 
leksie said:
SardonicGenie said:
All she said was that she didn't want to be in a relationships with a black man who has a bitter outlook on all black women, not black men who prefer white women.

Exactly. I personally can't get beyond the fact that black women are his mother, sisters- future daughter. It just doesn't wash with me regardless of how he has been wronged- I wouldn't judge all white, or black, or brown or whatever men in the same way.

Again, there is alot of cultural interactions going on in the States that we don't have here.

thanks guys by the way for the interesting discussion and those who seem to understand what I am saying.

assuming you date across the board (which I HIGHLY doubt)

what about asians that say that all their women chase after white men?

what about arabs who say all their women are too conservative?

what about white men who complain about aussie women being too feminist and demanding?

and believe me, the same cultural interactions are going on there as in the US, you are certainly blind to most of them, afterall you live in one of the few countries that has a small percentage of non-whites to keep up a P.C. facade, hopefully your country will continue to be flooded by the undesirable asians and muslims and africans and you will begin to see things ain't so sweet down under either.

remember your country needed martial law to keep 5,000 lunatic white boys from burning down mosques and attacking muslims regardless of whether they instigated or not. so keep pointing to the big bad wolf USA.

peace out
 
7Seven said:
MistressB said:
7Seven said:
tuckerreed said:
ok two posts that make little sense.

Mistress? presume what? I called you fine and said you know it, whats to presume--you are too intelligent to not know what I said.


7seven:
dude, what language are you speaking, can you make a clear english sentence without trying to add words to make it sound like you are intellectual? just talk plainly and we can tell whether you are smart or not.

:lol: Clearly, MissB and SD have no problem deducing my posts, really, maybe you should work on YOUR English. Show me a sentence you cannot understand or ask me to explain it instead of taking shots. So lets realise this fact....I know you have little knowledge on broad concepts and it intimidates you. God is Truth correct!? and that is all you need to know correct!? so pay my post no mind.....IT IS THAT SIMPLE REALLY!

To be fair, your grammar and sentence structure is awful - but I've had to mark and comprehend the work of children in grade school, so I can decipher it just fine!

:lol: More cheap shots! :lol: :lol: Please pick out a sentence of mine and explain to me how awful it is, because I haven't the time to sit and reread over and over what I type here, that is what I have Secretaries for, you know your type of work(grading children's work), womyn's work, whilst I concoct and use my spiral intelligence for strategic plans for the future of a multi billion dollar company. It is not my fault you can not read, understand, and construct logical deductions. I am use to constructing broad concepts to men whom understand broad concepts and does not need me to spell out every concept like a 12 year old girl.

Women's work? I'm training to be a lawyer, you fool.
 
SENGO_G said:
leksie said:
No LEKSIE, part of this conversation stems from the fact that you don't know jack about race relations ANYWHERE and should shut your trap before you expose anymore of your racial hypocrisy and inconstinence

It almost amazes me, you come from the same Australia where not more than 4 month ago, five thousand (FIVE THOUSAND) stone drunk racist white boy and girl took the liberty to attack anybody looking remotely middle eastern. All because of what -- White girl like you who say non-whites (in this case LEBANESE) give her dirty looks and approach her more than white......


You might get the odd racist dissaproval but we don't have the long (and yes, important to understand) history of slavery and the dimaterics which have consequently stemmed from that. So there isn't these motivators about the liberals assuaging their guilt (though that is an interesting point), the dialects on self-hate, opression and all the other things that are important in the states about stemming the racial divide.

Check yourself bud, I'm actually not Anglo-Saxon white to begin with, and yes I was as ashamed at the incident as the rest of us. It was nowhere near 5,000 people though.

My experience in race relations comes from my degrees, see few posts below, and experience working for MSF in various parts of Africa and South East Asia.

Relax babe, don't know who hurt you but don't take it out on me.
 
SENGO_G said:
leksie said:
You talk about Africans as if they're well integrated. How well integrated can .01% of 40 million people be, you just wait when more Africans start arriving in those boats and planes, we'll see how welcome and integrated they become. Besides, I know for a fact from friends who live there, Africans are already largely despised by not only whites, but Asians and Aborigines as well...

So to be honest, all these scripts about white women thinking they are looked at by every black man (who they pathetically and sadly seem to assume are no longer interested in black women, or men who sometimes might not be for one reason or another) is not something I can relate to at all. It's not something that informs IR relationships between black men/women here. I think that partly explains our different perspectives, I don't mean this in an accusatory way, but I guess there has been less time for a trench of bitterness where thing can be misinterpreted to have developed (as compared to what has happened with our Aboriginal people, for example- you could probably compare those race relations in many ways even though they are totally different situations)!

YES, yes, the same old racial hypocrisy and denial from the same white girl who actually thinks her africans friends and african boyfriend, and a TV documentary qualify her to speak on racial issues. WHAT A COMPLETE JOKE.

Continue to back-track all your last statements and reach into the air for something to justify your hypocrisy and denial towards black men.

Damn, relax! Please read your posts. I know we have a racism problem in Australia, and I DON"T talk about Africans as if they are well integrated- all I said is that their history is paralell to Australian history (that can be positive or negative), not intertwined as in the states. That's all I said, and that is fact.

I know there are problems with racism- you think after four years with an African man I haven't experienced it first hand? Though I knew about it long before being with him.


All I said is that the cultural landscape is very different to the states, and reactions and perspectives on IR are different because of that- not necessarily for better or worst, it just is. Really, this topic goes nowhere because you criticise without wanting to see what I write- but the lawyer in me can't help but respond...AUGh
 
Nice response leksie, very calm and classy - who cares what an idiot on the internet thinks of you anyway? What were your degrees in? Sounds interesting.

Just for fun, I've picked a choice selection of 7Seven's nonsense phrases and graded them for him:


I am use to constructing broad concepts to men whom understand broad concepts and does not need me to spell out every concept like a 12 year old girl. - (used; men WHO; do)

What cheap shots did I give that wasn't taken first!? - (weren't)

You see you even lack the metacognitive skills necessary to evaluate a sentence. Making your assertion SHIT MATE. (you can't start a sentence with Making)

To lack the former is to be deficient in the latter. Which you are, and which to that you can deduce my broad concepts. (these are broken clauses; the latter cannot possibly be a sentence in its own right)

I do it purposely! (on purpose?)

Which of course still does not take away from any of my arguments as people have been able to logically deduce simply for them to understand. (this is nonsensical)

Then further, to alpha males, concurrently it is about my ability to formulate proper grammatical sentences. (you needed a semi colon, and currently, not concurrently)

XX
 
SENGO_G said:
leksie said:
YES, yes, the same old racial hypocrisy and denial from the same white girl who actually thinks her africans friends and african boyfriend, and a TV documentary qualify her to speak on racial issues. WHAT A COMPLETE JOKE.

.

Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of my degrees in Development Studies (not sure if you have the course, it focusses on social, economic issues in developing countries and their interactions with developed nations) and Law, with a special interest in international law, qualify me more than my social circle.

Clearly however, you are pretty determined to think of me as a dumb, bitter white girl so let me make you happy:

"Damn, lemme just put on some tight pants cos I KNOw that what black man like, man I'm just so cute they just can't keep their hands off me. Wow i saw this interesting thing on TV the other night..it was about how like, different races sometimes like, fight and stuff..yeaaaa it's all really sad but you know, whatever, my man makes me an expert on that stuff and I know all the men like me so..ummm yaaaa whatever.."

Happy now? ;)
 
Btw, not sure if you meant it more generally as a slang term, but my man isn't West African at all, so from where I see it, Mandigo doesn't qualify. The "in you" thing is a little rough- let's save that for the sex forum huh.
 
Back
Top Bottom